| |
|
| |
Deep
Brain Stimulation Surgery |
| |
|
| |
What
is Deep Brain Stimulation ? |
| |
|
| |
Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) is a treatment for
selected patient with Parkinson's disease and most forms of tremors.
DBS consist of implantation of very thin DBS Lead which contains
four electrode contacts into the target area in the brain. The lead
extends through a small opening in the skull and is connected to
the extension that is then connected to an impulse generator or
pacemaker which is implanted under the skin over the chest. (Fig.
1) The entire system is implanted beneath the skin. DBS exerts its
therapeutic effect by delivering electrical impulses to the target
region.
|
| |

Fig.
1. Picture showing the electrodes and implantable pulse generator
|
| |
|
| |
Deep Brain Stimulation is an alternative
to ablative surgeries conventionally offered for Parkinson's disease
and other related movement disorders. The common targets for DBS
surgery within the brain, for movement disorder include, subthalamic
nucleus (STN) for Parkinson's disease, ventro-intermedius nucleus
of thalamus for tremors, and pallidum for dystonia. Though each
of this target sites can be used for different movement disorder,
we believe that these are best for the respective disease as indicated.
|
| |
|
| |
The therapy of Deep Brain Stimulation requires
additional expertise over conventional stereotactic techniques that
are required for functional neurosurgical procedures for movement
disorder. It requires careful understanding of the principles of
DBS, understanding of the disease being treated and combining the
medical therapy along with stimulation to achieve smooth control
of the disease. Jaslok Hospital & Research Center has been able
to develop a multi-disciplinary team to undertake this therapy of
DBS. It has performed large number of surgeries for Parkinson's
disease and other movement disorder during the past few years. The
Multi-disciplinary team includes Movement Disorder Neurologist Dr.
Mohit Bhatt, Neuroradiologist Dr. Srinivas Desai and Dr. Kohli and
Functional Neurosurgeon Dr. Paresh Doshi. This team is supported
by the presence of research fellow, occupational therapist, physiotherapist
and anaesthesiologist. At present this centre has the largest experience
of DBS surgeries in Asia.
|
| |
|
| |
The
advantage of DBS over lesional surgeries is that there is no destruction
of intracranial nuclei, thus, virtually leaving the patient and
his brain intact and available for any future therapies that may
come up. The morbidity of the stimulation procedure is also less
than lesional surgeries. DBS leads are programmed with the help
of an external programmer. This gives the surgeon flexibility in
optimizing the current and electrode contacts in each individual
patient to suit his requirements.
|
| |
|
| |
On
the downside, the therapy as mentioned above requires high level
of surgical expertise that may not be available at many centres.
The other disadvantage is a close follow-up, though not frequent,
that is required in order to achieve good and sustained control
of the disease. This is not the case in lesional surgeries as patients
can be followed up at their respective centres after the surgery.
The therapy is also more costly than the lesional surgeries.
|
| |
|
| |
How
is Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery performed ? |
| |
|
| |
The
surgical steps for a standard STN stimulation procedure are described.
The surgeries for thalamic and pallidal targets are performed in a
more or less similar manner. |
| |
|
| |
The surgery is performed using CRW (Cosman-Robert
Wales) stereotactic system. The stereotactic frame is fixed to the
patient's head under local anaesthesia. The anatomical target localization
is performed using computerized tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance
imaging (MRI). An inversion recovery, sagittal MRI is obtained to
identify the anterior commissure (AC) and posterior commissure (PC).
A heavily T2 weighted, coronal MRI sequence is then obtained perpendicular
to the AC-PC plane. The STN is typically identified on a slice 2mm
posterior to the mid-commissural point. Usually this also correlated
with the anterior margin of the red nucleus. STN target is identified
2 mm posterior to the midcommissural point and 11-12 mm lateral
and 4mm inferior to this plane. Axial computerized tomography (CT)
scan is performed to double-check the MRI co-ordinates. Once the
anatomical target is calculated, the stimulating electrode is inserted
through a pre-coronal burr hole. Motor stimulation is performed
at 5 Hz. frequency and the sensory stimulation is performed at 100
Hz. frequency. Stimulating electrode is used to stimulate the STN
and gauge patient's response to both motor and sensory stimulation.
The neurologist present in the operation theater assessed the improvement
in tremors, rigidity and bradykinesia. The site where there is maximal
improvement and least side effects is taken as the final position
for implantation of DBS lead. Presence of dyskinesia on the table
during sensory stimulation is considered to be a positive confirmatory
sign for target localization. Once the confirmation of the STN target
is obtained, the stimulating electrode is replaced with DBS electrode
(Medtronic DBS electrode 3389-40). Both the electrodes are implanted
on the same day. On the next day under general anesthesia the pulse
generator (Itrel 2 or Kinetra) is implanted in the infraclavicular
fossa. Postoperative CT scan is performed to confirm the position
of the electrodes.
|
| |
|
| |
Results
|
| |
|
| |
Thirty-five deep brain stimulation surgeries have
been performed at Jaslok Hospital & Research Center in past two
years. Out of this, there were two thalamic DBS surgeries for tremors
and thirty-three subthalamic nucleus DBS surgeries for advanced
Parkinson's disease. Recently we have analysed twenty-five patients
of DBS with following results. The improvement in the total "off"
phase UPDRS score was approximately 60% and 70% respectively at
six months and one year follow up. The scores for activities of
daily living improved by 43% and 62% at six months and one year
follow up respectively. The patients had become independent and
were able to resume back their work. The levodopa requirement of
these patients was reduced by 10%-80% with an average reduction
of more than 50%. Three patients were able to stop all Levodopa
medication. This drug reduction helped in alleviating all the levodopa
related side effects (dyskinesia, hallucinations, etc.).
|
| |
|